Home Events Programm calendar Tickets Partners Press Imprint

Festival | Presenter

LANGUAGE and movie viewer. About the film says a lot and in different ways. Ethicists to establish the interdependence of Motion Picture Arts and morals of society.Sociologists investigate the effect of the screen to the crime.Psychologists try to penetrate into the processes in the minds of viewers. Emphasis on aesthetic beauty education. But they all base their argument on the particular movie that defined most of the problems associated with the viewers perception. This feature - the film mass, its relationship with millions of viewers. Different types of art have their own audience. There are lovers of the ballet, there are fans of poetry, there are fans of the theater. They have specific knowledge, skills, perceptions of different, sometimes very complex images. Artists take this into account, as well as existing to the public taste, preferences, needs. At the same time dominated by a relatively clear differentiation and organ concerts fans will not see, in general, the jazz program. However, there is an art form that combines all categories of viewers. It is an art - cinema (also literature under him in this respect). It seems that, the establishment of this fact logically lead to the following thoughts: a moviegoer - a limitless sea of ​​people, very different in age, knowledge, education, tastes, inclinations, spiritual needs, etc., it is impossible speak of moviegoers in general, the need to examine their needs, tastes, preferences, etc. But in the early days of cinema, its first theorists insisted on the study of the public. With each decade of the cinema audience all his extended and expanded. Whereas previously there were people who did not recognize the "great silent 'movie masterpieces ignored, and admit as bad shape that there was a movie, but now these" spiritual elect, "as they sit called sarcastically Dellyuk, in the auditorium next to the cinema people just